Comments on: How Seriously Should England Take the Ukraine Game?

By: Ukrainian

Ukrainian — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:01:27 +0000

Ukraine – England 1:0
Where is your god now?

By: Ebrahim

Ebrahim — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:35:49 +0000

That might happen, irish hottie. If only “Ireland” was actually a country

By: Daryl

Daryl — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:33:21 +0000

That’s a very specific prediction irish hottie.

By: irish hottie

irish hottie — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:03:56 +0000

england are crap, they will be dominated by ireland when we make it to the world cup and are drawn with them in group b along with ghana and nth korea.

By: Seth

Seth — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 04:59:57 +0000

“a) It’s not clever or original if a thousand other people have already said it first, and
b) You deserve to be stabbed in the leg with a pencil.”

lolol

By: Daryl

Daryl — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:32:06 +0000

Looks like the Belarus game will be unimportant, in that we’re already qualified and they can no longer qualify.

So I agree with you now Ebrahim, we should definitely field our strongest team vs Ukraine (because that game has implications for both Ukraine and Croatia). But I’d be in favour of mixing it up a little vs Belarus.

By: Daryl

Daryl — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:26:32 +0000

You’re right Ebrahim, we also play Belarus at Wembley on October 14th. Will update the post to reflect that now.

By: Ebrahim

Ebrahim — Tue, 22 Sep 2009 07:40:48 +0000

Haven’t we also got Belarus to play too?? That makes it TWO competitive games left.

I reckon it would be totally wrong to field a weakened side, and it will do the players some good to get to know each other some more so i say play the best team possible (and make the maximum three subs).