<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Friendly:  Some Unimpressed Commentators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html</link>
	<description>World Cup 2010 - South Africa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:57:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: owen</title>
		<link>http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html/comment-page-1#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 17:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html#comment-413</guid>
		<description>dear compatriot,

well, by the same token they would still have also beaten the US by 3-1 or more - Hungary played as well as the US has in its friendlies. The ONLY team I have seen in friendlies yet that really looked on world cup form and showed it was Argentina. Even Brazil is just messing about.

I was most impressed that England got 3 (should have been 4) against a team that defended very hard the whole game. It took England the first half to figure out how to break the defence down - but they did.

Not a world cup winner performance but you could see many of the players holding back  so as not to get injured - I&#039;d say they looked good for this stage. But we&#039;ll see - it&#039;ll all change June 9th. And whoever wins is going to need luck as well as skill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear compatriot,</p>
<p>well, by the same token they would still have also beaten the US by 3-1 or more &#8211; Hungary played as well as the US has in its friendlies. The ONLY team I have seen in friendlies yet that really looked on world cup form and showed it was Argentina. Even Brazil is just messing about.</p>
<p>I was most impressed that England got 3 (should have been 4) against a team that defended very hard the whole game. It took England the first half to figure out how to break the defence down &#8211; but they did.</p>
<p>Not a world cup winner performance but you could see many of the players holding back  so as not to get injured &#8211; I&#8217;d say they looked good for this stage. But we&#8217;ll see &#8211; it&#8217;ll all change June 9th. And whoever wins is going to need luck as well as skill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Akbar</title>
		<link>http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html/comment-page-1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Akbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html#comment-407</guid>
		<description>Our American friend said it all. It really depends on which half your watching. Half-time comments:

&quot;It&#039;s so boring when they pass it around at the back - but the Mexican wave was good.&quot; 
Ian Wright, BBC Sport 

&quot;For the first 40 minutes of the first half I thought it was the worst game I&#039;d ever seen in my life. He should put Michael Carrick on now.&quot;
Alan Hansen, BBC Sport 

&quot;Steven Gerrard cannot make the runs or breaks we&#039;re used to seeing because he&#039;s playing too far in front of the ball. For Liverpool he can see the runs to make but here he&#039;s coming off Michael Owen and he doesn&#039;t really know where to go. After 45 minutes I&#039;d say he can&#039;t play in that position.&quot;
Graham Taylor, BBC Five Live 

&quot;I wouldn&#039;t change it straight away as that&#039;s a sign of failure. But after 15 minutes I&#039;d take off Beckham and play Gerrard on the right-hand side. He&#039;ll probably take off Carragher and go 4-4-2 with his tried-and-tested midfield four.&quot;
Terry Butcher, BBC Five Live 

&quot;Michael Owen is not a lone striker - it&#039;s not Michael&#039;s game. You want him sniffing runs off somebody else. Better sides would be able to handle this much better than Hungary. It won&#039;t surprise me too see Peter Crouch come on.&quot;
Graham Taylor, BBC Five Live</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our American friend said it all. It really depends on which half your watching. Half-time comments:</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s so boring when they pass it around at the back &#8211; but the Mexican wave was good.&#8221;<br />
Ian Wright, BBC Sport </p>
<p>&#8220;For the first 40 minutes of the first half I thought it was the worst game I&#8217;d ever seen in my life. He should put Michael Carrick on now.&#8221;<br />
Alan Hansen, BBC Sport </p>
<p>&#8220;Steven Gerrard cannot make the runs or breaks we&#8217;re used to seeing because he&#8217;s playing too far in front of the ball. For Liverpool he can see the runs to make but here he&#8217;s coming off Michael Owen and he doesn&#8217;t really know where to go. After 45 minutes I&#8217;d say he can&#8217;t play in that position.&#8221;<br />
Graham Taylor, BBC Five Live </p>
<p>&#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t change it straight away as that&#8217;s a sign of failure. But after 15 minutes I&#8217;d take off Beckham and play Gerrard on the right-hand side. He&#8217;ll probably take off Carragher and go 4-4-2 with his tried-and-tested midfield four.&#8221;<br />
Terry Butcher, BBC Five Live </p>
<p>&#8220;Michael Owen is not a lone striker &#8211; it&#8217;s not Michael&#8217;s game. You want him sniffing runs off somebody else. Better sides would be able to handle this much better than Hungary. It won&#8217;t surprise me too see Peter Crouch come on.&#8221;<br />
Graham Taylor, BBC Five Live</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USA</title>
		<link>http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html/comment-page-1#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>USA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://england.worldcupblog.org/1/the-friendly-some-unimpressed-commentators.html#comment-405</guid>
		<description>depends on which half you watched.  Those folks must have turned their television set off at the intermission.  England obviously played better in the 2nd half.  However, I am yet to see a form that caused me to initially predict they would at least be in the semifinals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>depends on which half you watched.  Those folks must have turned their television set off at the intermission.  England obviously played better in the 2nd half.  However, I am yet to see a form that caused me to initially predict they would at least be in the semifinals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
